<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantic Web Or Tagged Web</title>
	<link>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/</link>
	<description>Search Engines, Domains, Statistics and Analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John McCormac</title>
		<link>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>Tagging photostreams is a lot better than having a search engine try to categorise them Bernie. The social bookmarks aspect is a very interesting one though and one that could be the next evolution of the super directories like &lt;a href="http://www.dmoz.org"&gt;Dmoz&lt;/a&gt; which rely on people editing and categorising websites.

The idea of tagging websites is not new. Some people mentioned that it could help the bigger search engines like Google and Yahoo if a geolocation tag was included in the meta data for webpages. The social bookmarks idea turns it on its head and puts the user/reader rather than the webmaster at the top of the chain. It also is similar to how the Amazon book recommendation system works. I remember Philip Greenspun describing an example of MIT Medialab cluelessness about how some e-jits developed something there called Firefly to suggest potential book choices to customers on a book site while Amazon's solution was obvious and simple. Social bookmarks system have that elegant simplicity.

Social bookmarks are perhaps more difficult to game than a self-categorisation system because they have a consensus aspect that self-categorisation does not have. Photostreams and their categorisation give search engine operators nightmares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagging photostreams is a lot better than having a search engine try to categorise them Bernie. The social bookmarks aspect is a very interesting one though and one that could be the next evolution of the super directories like <a href="http://www.dmoz.org">Dmoz</a> which rely on people editing and categorising websites.</p>
<p>The idea of tagging websites is not new. Some people mentioned that it could help the bigger search engines like Google and Yahoo if a geolocation tag was included in the meta data for webpages. The social bookmarks idea turns it on its head and puts the user/reader rather than the webmaster at the top of the chain. It also is similar to how the Amazon book recommendation system works. I remember Philip Greenspun describing an example of MIT Medialab cluelessness about how some e-jits developed something there called Firefly to suggest potential book choices to customers on a book site while Amazon&#8217;s solution was obvious and simple. Social bookmarks system have that elegant simplicity.</p>
<p>Social bookmarks are perhaps more difficult to game than a self-categorisation system because they have a consensus aspect that self-categorisation does not have. Photostreams and their categorisation give search engine operators nightmares.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bernie Goldbach</title>
		<link>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>I think tagging on Flickr photostreams and on del.icio.us social bookmarks works better than tagging hyperlinks on blog entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think tagging on Flickr photostreams and on del.icio.us social bookmarks works better than tagging hyperlinks on blog entries.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: fmk</title>
		<link>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.whoisireland.com/2005/02/19/semantic-web-or-tagged-web/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>but doesn't this whole self-tagging thing just take us back to meta tags? and we all know how easy they were to abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but doesn&#8217;t this whole self-tagging thing just take us back to meta tags? and we all know how easy they were to abuse.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
