Is New Legislation A Death Warrant For IEDR?

The Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill 2007 published on Friday may potentially be a death warrant for the IEDR. It contains enough provisions to effectively remove the administration of .ie ccTLD from IEDR should the Communications Regulator (ComReg) so wish. It also allows Comreg to levy IEDR and if necessary, fine it for non-compliance.

The first interesting amendment is this:

32.—(1) The purpose of this Part is to facilitate easy comprehension, fairness, transparency, avoidance of deception, promotion of fair competition and public confidence with respect to the use of ‘.ie’ domain names.

While it looks harmless it is rather powerful. Domainwarehosing and cybersquatting operations are effectively covered by this. The main domain warehousing/cybersquatting operation in .ie ccTLD is EUBROWSER.COM. It has over 500 .ie domains registered and has registered a number of high profile trademarks such as ADIDAS, NIKE, BEBO, ONECARE, WINDOWS-ONECARE as .ie domains using Registered Business Name certificates. It has also registered IRISHINDEPENDENT.ie, the name of one of the largest daily Irish newspapers using an RBN. This certainly falls under the “avoidance of deception” aspect of the above.

32.—(3) The Commission may make regulations for
the purposes of this section, but only after consul-
tation with the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and
Employment and such other persons and public
bodies (if any) as the Commission thinks
appropriate.

That subsection is where IEDR is effectively stripped of deciding the registration policy for .ie domains. Under this subsection, it is now the province of Comreg though it has to consult with the Minister and others. This is a big win for the industry. The members of the board of IEDR are just there because of who they know rather than for their industry expertise. This contention that the board of IEDR was a dumping ground for UCD and former Telecom Eireann staff and their friends was a commonly held one during the IEDR’s Fagan years and it was a source of irritation for the Irish internet industry. None of the board of IEDR has any known operational experience of the domain name and hosting industry.
Subsection 4 effectively gives Comreg complete power over .ie ccTLD: designating the authority to register .ie domains; setting renewal periods and conditions; revoking registrations, registration conditions; pricing of .ie domains and appeals against revocation of registrations.

Timetravel, it appears has been discovered. According to subsection 5, this law is retroactive:

32.—(5) The regulations shall provide that persons who have registered ‘.ie’ domain names before the regulations came into operation are taken to have
registered those names under the regulations.

Breaking the rules will be expensive. The new legislation allows for a fine of up to 5000 Euro on summary conviction.

Section 33 allows Comreg to impose a levy on IEDR for funding its activities. Maybe the management of IEDR might have to take a pay cut if this is ever used. Section 34 allows Comreg to access all .ie data including, apparently, the accounts of IEDR.

Section 35 gives Comreg the power to designate an interim registration authority and defines the term of such an appointment as being 12 months. This appointment can be renewed subsequently with the consent of the Minister. That’s basically the power to strip IEDR completely of the administration of .ie ccTLD.

Had this legislation been in force when IEDR was spun off from UCD and during the Fagan years, there is no doubt that the current IEDR would not be administering .ie ccTLD. However IEDR has changed considerably since 2000. The board of IEDR is still a bunch of talking heads who are there because of who they know rather than because of their industry expertise. They are even more irrelevant now.

The most important part of this legislation is that it strips IEDR of the policy making function for .ie ccTLD. This could be a mixed blessing for the industry. The provisions to revoke IEDR’s control of .ie ccTLD are there. If this is indeed IEDR’s death warrant, then it just hasn’t been signed and dated yet. It might have the effect of making IEDR somewhat more responsive to industry concerns. But changing policy and perhaps the introduction of personal .ie domains might become a bit more complex.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Written by John McCormac on February 3rd, 2007 with 10 comments.
Read more articles on Domains And Statistics and Irish Tech News and Tech Commentary.

Related articles

10 comments

Read the comments left by other users below, or:

Trackback Mention from Cearta.ie
#1. February 4th, 2007, at 12:51 AM.

cearta.ie » Blog Archive » New Bills: Update: John McCormac on whoisireland has written an extremely interesting and very detailed post on this issue. Required reading, ...

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Eoin
#2. February 4th, 2007, at 12:58 AM.

Couldn’t agree more, and I’ve said so on m blog.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com John McCormac
#3. February 4th, 2007, at 2:28 AM.

It is an interesting bit of legislation Eoin,
It goes a lot farther than most people expected and I don’t expect IEDR to be pleased with it. Some people in the industry are a bit worried as it might involve educating ComReg on the domains business and everyone has seen how well it has handled telcoms issues.

I only picked it up because I’m still on the press list for the department. Ironically none of the Irish “technology” press seems to have looked at it. It was hardly being introduced in the same stealthy way that the data retention stuff was introduced.

Nobody on the board of IEDR has any expertise in the domain/hosting business. In any genuine company, the board is meant to be a resource of expertise. If there had been real expertise and a chairman with industry expertise, then the .ie ccTLD would be in a lot better health than it is. Now it is competing with .com/net/org/biz/info/eu for registrations and almost breaking even. The lack of a personal subdomain means that all those new webmasters and personal registrations go right to .com/net/org/biz/info/eu rather than .ie ccTLD. That’s tragic because .ie does not represent the Ireland as a result.

The decision was made, years ago by people who didn’t have a clue about the domain business to keep .ie for businesses. It may have been a political decision or it could have been an IEDR one. In any case it was both wrong and stupid. But then with IEDR being a dumping ground for UCD and Telecom Eireann, commercial knowledge was scarce. These guys just weren’t capable of operating in a free market and as the Fagan years demonstrated, were not capable of operating a registry.

Most of these amendments stem from that time. By giving ComReg the policy aspect and involving others in the decision making process it brings .ie ccTLD into the 20th century. But the penalties, including the appointment of an interim authority are the equivalent of strategic nuclear weapons.

At the moment, the industry/IEDR relationship has improved considerably. Though legally everything still exists at the whim of IEDR management. It is David Curtin who has effectively turned the operation around.

Perhaps the legislation is to be used more for deterrence and to keep IEDR working well. I wouldn’t be surprised to see resignations from the board of IEDR if this thing becomes law as most of the board are there purely for CV purposes rather than to offer any expertise.

For those of us who watched the near destruction of .ie in recent years, the legislation is long overdue.

Trackback Mention from Mneylon.com
#4. February 6th, 2007, at 9:59 PM.

Irish Government To Kill IE ccTLD?: While I was in LA last week John sent me details of the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill 2007.

Trackback Mention from Irishwebmasterforum.com
#5. February 6th, 2007, at 10:32 PM.

Legislation Affecting IE domains - Irish SEO, Marketing & Webmaster Discussion: Legislation Affecting IE domains Irish Government To Kill IE ccTLD? Is New Legislation A Death Warrant ...

Trackback Mention from Cearta.ie
#6. February 7th, 2007, at 5:56 PM.

cearta.ie » Blog Archive » New Bills: Updates: There are good discussions of the Bill in ElectricNews.net and by Barry O’Halloran in the Irish Times. John ...

Trackback Mention from Lexferenda.com
#7. February 8th, 2007, at 8:04 PM.

Lex Ferenda » Dot IE and the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill: And John at whoisireland.com says: 32.—(3) The Commission may make regulations for the purposes of this section, but only ...

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com John McCormac
#8. April 8th, 2007, at 3:20 PM.

Due to historical mismanagement, .ie is not exactly a world player. Most of the bigger trademark holders don’t take that much notice of it. However Adidas did take and win an IEDRP against Eubrowser over the cybersquatting of adidas.ie. There are other clear infringements of intellectual property in .ie as well. The US has the Cybersquatting legislation which makes it easier to prosecute a number of offences at once. With .ie, each case has to be treated separately.

Leave your comment...

If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:




You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> .